Wednesday, September 23, 2009

The Identity of ourselves

Do we imprison ourselves and deny our own freedoms? 
People have been known to "deceive" themselves "and act as if we weren't free". We feel the need to fit the "expectations of other people". Thus we delude ourselves into thinking there is no other choice, then to make ourselves into what other people want of us. In thinking, no one can be an absolute individual because we choose who we are based on subjective views of the world. Denying our freedom by telling ourselves there is no other way. This way we only connect with the face in the mirror. the person we project to the world rather then the one that lives inside of us, who knows that there are more options then what we give ourselves. Much tension is created this way. Banach says people seem to wonder "how the person in the glass can be ME if I am standing out here looking at it". Though I think in general people do not find it odd to be both inside the glass and outside it because they identify themselves with the person in the glass more then the one staring at her own reflection. The person in the glass can also be seen as a role, "we play the roles; we make ourselves into characters in the plays". It seems like life is one big play. And the role/ character we choose to play is someone who has been defined by the people and places around us. But the question arises why do we allow ourselves to trap ourselves. Everyone is free to choose, "we cannot escape our freedom". This freedom is always there in the back of our minds even if people do not realize it. The body can be controlled but the mind is free. Our body plays along with all the whims of society and our mind watches and waits patiently for its turn, to bring sense back and remind us that we are indeed free to make our own choices.

"Our freedom is, thus, a freedom of synthesis. It is the freedom to pull ourselves together into the type of coherent whole that we will ourselves to be". In this sense people can still be something of what they make of themselves. Even if everything is determined in how we are made it is still in our power on how to act on those things. For example the saying " when life gives you lemons, make lemon aid". Thus the complaining or argument that we not absolute individuals because everything influences is in some words incorrect. Because we have the will to use those influences to shape ourselves into something better and new. And in turn this puts a much brighter outlook on life, that we do indeed have freedom to which we can obtain our individuality.

1 comment:

  1. Dear Kate,
    I appreciate how you thoroughly answer the question in your entry with different mediums of examples. Within the entry, you respond to the question of whether or not we imprison ourselves and deny our freedoms by saying indeed we do. At one point, you use Banach’s example of “the person in the glass” and later utilize the popular expression “when life gives you lemon, make lemonade”. You comment on how external influence does not decrease the absolute individuality of someone, in an almost challenging tone. The idea of looking into a mirror and forcing yourself to believe it’s you can be easily connected to an actor or singer watching him or herself back on a previous televised or recorded performance. The idea of watching yourself vs. living as you is an idea that everyone has to come to terms with in his or her life. To just fix up some of the mechanics of your piece, you could work on grammar and also make sure that you are citing Banach or Sartre. Also, make sure that the sentences flow in a more linear way, so the reader can really grasp all of the ideas that you have. If you would like, you can expand on your entry by adding a bit more of a connection of the topics discussed in your entry to the world and defend your answer a tad bit more so that the reader feels you have truthful conviction. Your post makes me consider that we do have freedom to gain individuality, but it matters how we utilize the forces around us to get there. The resolve at the end of your entry helped to lighten my perception in existentialistic thinking. Continue to share your opinions and I enjoyed hearing your own take on the lecture.
    Sincerely,
    Hayley

    ReplyDelete